The Murdaugh Murders, Money & Mystery | Criminally Obsessed
Author: Anne Emerson, Charlie Condon, Drew Tripp, Daniel Michener, Maxwell Harrison
Subscribed: 1,354Played: 32,478Description
The Murdaugh Murders, Money & Mystery is a podcast detailing the horrific and devious crimes committed by Alex Murdaugh, a hotshot personal injury lawyer and heir to a powerful South Carolina legal dynasty. Murdaugh was convicted in 2023 of murdering his own wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, in the a sickening culmination to a brazen white-collar fraud scheme run amok.
Prosecutors successfully argued the ruthless killings were Murdaugh's desperate, egregious ploy to avoid impending ruin after stealing over $10 million from his often destitute and disabled clients, along with the partners in his family's namesake law firm.
After a fatal boat crash involving his spoiled son all but assured Murdaugh's treachery would come to light, he concocted a brutal ruse aimed at shielding himself from scrutiny long enough to cover his tracks and preserve his family's legacy — and wealth. In the end, he failed at both.
Join host Anne Emerson, producer Drew Tripp and legal analyst Charlie Condon (former South Carolina Attorney General) as they navigate the complicated legal twists and stunning interpersonal dramas of this saga, which traces back to the turn of the 20th century and continues to develop.
(The Murdaugh Murders, Money & Mystery is a Criminally Obsessed audio original, produced beginning in 2021 in partnership with WCIV-TV ABC News 4 in Charleston.)






I'm about to lose my mind with all the ummhum's. Please mute the 🎤
I have listened to this at night and the dreams i have had have been just as weird as this topic. This podcast doesnt go into details too much. It is like people arguing with reasonable minds. Thank you. I could sleep listening to true crime. The only one is yours because of your diskussions felt like falling asleep as a kid when growniups were talking somehow. If that makes sense thank you for this podcast
I have listened to this at night and the dreams i have had have been just as weird as this topic. This podcast doesnt go into details too much. It is like people arguing with reasonable minds. Thank you. I could sleep listening to true crime. The only one is yours because of your diskussions felt like falling asleep as a kid when growniups were talking somehow. If that makes sense thank you for this podcast
This pov is fascinating. I would be so confused too
Alex, his intention was suicide from the beginning. His world was about to crumble and he couldn't face the consequences. There were issues with a suicide though, his insurance wouldn't pay; furthermore, he didn't want his wife getting any money nor his troubled, youngest son Paul. Buster was the only worthy beneficiary. Maggie and Paul had to die for Buster to get the million dollar pay-out. The plan was simple, kill Maggie and Paul and then have someone kill him; for example, a stranger who had nothing better to do but kill some poor soul whom he saw changing a tire on a lowly-traveled road.
Glad I found this podcast. It's easy to listen to and it sums things up nicely.
What does Drew think a missed call is? To me and everyone I know a missed call is an incoming call that was not answered. On the February 3 trial recap edition, the Agent testifies there were 73 calls missing from Alex's phone for June 7, but were actually on the Verizon log of calls for June 7. Said Agent refers to these as “missing” calls (as they are missing from Alex’s phone) not “missed” calls. During the podcast discussion that follows that playing of this testimony, Drew refers to those 73 calls as "missed" calls, not once, but he actually says it twice 😩. Charles follows with “Wow, I missed that”. Drew then immediately opines that “73 “missed” calls were missing”. After Charles makes a comment, Drew again refers to them saying “…. Why are 73 “missed” calls missing from your phone?” 😣 Anne then joins the discussion, but seems to have a different understanding of what a missed call is saying “ ….who was he calling, who was calling him…” Please clear up the confusion you 3 have